Rare earth stocks hit 52-week lows
William Blair says investors counting on US-China detente misread the supply chain, prices stay high but most producers lack the separation and magnet capacity to capture them
Images
zerohedge.com
zerohedge.com
zerohedge.com
zerohedge.com
Rare earth equities have hit 52-week lows, and the VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF has lost more than half its value since its May peak. William Blair analyst Neal Dingmann puts the rout down to revived rate-hike fears, hot inflation prints, and sector-specific worries — above all, to investor bets that improving US-China relations will cool the supply scarcity. Those bets, he wrote, are incorrect.
The physical market has been telling a different story from the ticker. Rare earth prices remain strong, buyers still want supply that does not run through China, and the gap between elevated prices and tumbling junior miners — what one note earlier in the week dubbed the "Great Rare Earth Disconnect" — has grown wide enough that Canaccord's critical minerals team openly questioned the scale of the selloff. William Blair's basket of seven rare earth stocks fell about 30 percent in a month.
The reason most listed producers cannot capture high prices is metallurgy, not sentiment. Many have limited output at the mine or lack capacity at the processing, alloy, and magnet stages — the stages that remain concentrated in China — and no communiqué from the Trump-Xi meetings scheduled for November and the December G20 changes a flowsheet. What falling share prices do change is the balance sheet. Mines, processing plants, and magnet factories are capital-intensive; raising equity at depressed valuations turns dilutive, and Dingmann warned that some miners face a "debt wall," substantial shareholder dilution, or material project delays. Milestone-based government funding, he noted, has yet to be collected by many companies. In his reading, investors are rotating out of strategic-value narratives and into production and cash flow, which favors MP Materials, with its offtake agreements and price floors, and Lynas Rare Earths, with limited funding needs and a long operating record — the two names least dependent on new money from anyone.
A rebound, Dingmann suggested, requires renewed Chinese restrictions, the arrival of government funds, or company production milestones. Two of those three triggers sit with Beijing and Washington; only the third belongs to the companies themselves.