Technology

US House backs AM radio mandate for new cars

Automakers cite EV interference and shifting dashboards, legacy broadcast wins a free slot in the touchscreen era

Images

Kirsten Korosec Kirsten Korosec techcrunch.com

Nitter is now read-only on GitHub and XCancel has suspended service, ending two of the most widely used privacy-friendly windows into X’s public posts after renewed legal pressure from the platform. According to TechCrunch, Nitter’s GitHub repository was archived on September 11, and XCancel posted a shutdown message on September 14 citing “new developments” in ongoing legal proceedings.

The services mattered less as “apps” than as plumbing. Nitter, an open-source project, fetched public posts and stripped out ads, tracking cookies, and heavy JavaScript, letting users read without logging in or boosting X’s engagement metrics. XCancel relied on Nitter to provide a lightweight interface that could be shared and embedded, a common workaround as X has tightened access to its own interface and data. When X restricts third-party access, it is not only controlling branding and user experience; it is also deciding which forms of reading count as a monetisable view.

X’s legal argument, as described by TechCrunch, is that Nitter unlawfully used and circumvented X’s API and associated data, including claims about scraping and access to accounts and session tokens in violation of X’s rules. Nitter’s maintainers responded by saying they would follow legal advice and provide more details later, but the archiving of the repository removes the obvious path for rapid fixes and community-driven maintenance. The episode echoes earlier crackdowns: TechCrunch notes that in 2024 Nitter’s main instance went offline after new API restrictions, and that hosting a Nitter instance later required connecting it to a real X account, turning “anonymous reading” into “reading through someone’s credentials.”

The broader effect is a narrowing of the public internet around private gates. X posts can still be “public” in the sense of being viewable, but the platform increasingly dictates the terms: what code runs on the user’s device, what tracking occurs, and whether access is conditioned on an account relationship. That control also changes who can safely monitor X at scale—researchers, journalists, and ordinary users who prefer not to accept the platform’s tracking and ad load lose a low-friction option, while X keeps the ability to count, profile, and monetise the audience.

Nitter’s repository remains visible but frozen, and XCancel’s shutdown message sits where its interface used to be.