Politics

Undercover film shows Reform UK officials discussing foreign-funded polling

Channel 4 says advisers described off-the-book project later carried by UK papers, election-law enforcement hinges on disclosures insiders control

Images

Nigel Farage poses with a tea towel merchandise during the first day of Reform UK’s annual conference at the NEC in Birmingham. Photograph: Tolga Akmen/EPA Nigel Farage poses with a tea towel merchandise during the first day of Reform UK’s annual conference at the NEC in Birmingham. Photograph: Tolga Akmen/EPA theguardian.com
Footage from the Channel 4 News and Verbatim undercover investigation into Reform finances. Footage from the Channel 4 News and Verbatim undercover investigation into Reform finances. theguardian.com

An undercover investigation broadcast by Channel 4 News shows senior Reform UK figures discussing ways a wealthy American could finance party activity without it appearing as a foreign donation. The footage, shot at and around Reform’s annual conference at the NEC in Birmingham and in meetings in Clacton, appears to capture party officials describing an “off-the-book” polling project later reported in the Telegraph and the Times.

According to The Guardian, journalists from Verbatim—an investigative unit founded by the Centre for Climate Reporting—posed as a potential UK-based supporter and his US-based father, who would be an impermissible donor under UK election rules. The pair offered to fund polling that would benefit Reform, and the undercover team says the father paid for £30,000 of polling carried out by JL Partners. In the reported scenario, the polling’s provenance was obscured: it was not attributed to Reform, and the resulting coverage in the Telegraph and the Times did not disclose that it had been commissioned for Reform and funded by the supposed American donor.

The alleged mechanics matter because election law is enforced through paperwork. A poll that helps a party can count as a “benefit in kind” that must be declared, and foreign money is restricted; if the poll is commissioned and paid for in a way that avoids both public attribution and reporting to the Electoral Commission, the system relies on insiders choosing to disclose what outsiders cannot see. In the footage, Dan Jukes, described as a senior adviser to Nigel Farage, is shown suggesting the US-based father could make a substantial donation by channeling it through the son. James Orr, Reform’s head of policy, is shown discussing the polling arrangement and saying Farage “doesn’t know, won’t know” about it and that it was the kind of thing he would “rather not know,” while also describing it as “totally legit,” according to The Guardian.

The episode also drags in institutions that sit adjacent to party finance rules but can amplify their effects. The Telegraph suspended articles about the polling after learning about the funding source, The Guardian reports, while the Times said it was not aware of the relationship between the polling and Reform UK. That leaves a familiar gap: political messaging can travel through ostensibly independent news coverage, while compliance is assessed later—if at all—through declarations that depend on the very actors who benefited from the activity.

Reform UK said it had been the target of a hoax by foreign-funded climate-change activists posing as would-be party donors and denied wrongdoing. The party’s approach to donations and finances is already subject to a standards inquiry and a police investigation, The Guardian reports.

In the footage, Farage is shown thanking the fake donors after the possible donation structure was explained. Whether the relevant authorities treat the polling as a reportable benefit or an attempted circumvention will turn on documents that, for now, are not public.