Middle East

Houthis open new front in Iran war

Bab al-Mandab threat revives Red Sea rerouting, shipping insurers and carrier risk models decide what counts as a blockade

Images

Houthi forces said they had fired ballistic missiles at ‘sensitive Israeli military sites’ and would continue military operations until the ‘aggression’ came to an end on all fronts Photograph: Mohammed Hamoud/Getty Images Houthi forces said they had fired ballistic missiles at ‘sensitive Israeli military sites’ and would continue military operations until the ‘aggression’ came to an end on all fronts Photograph: Mohammed Hamoud/Getty Images theguardian.com
Middle East crisis live: Houthis launch drone attack on Israel; UN peacekeeper killed in Lebanon Middle East crisis live: Houthis launch drone attack on Israel; UN peacekeeper killed in Lebanon theguardian.com

Two unmanned aerial vehicles launched from Yemen were intercepted by Israel’s air force on Saturday, according to a live update from the Guardian, after the Iran-aligned Houthi movement said it had fired ballistic missiles at Israeli military sites.

The Houthis’ entry adds a second maritime choke point to a conflict already centred on the Strait of Hormuz. According to the Guardian’s analysis, the group has the geographic advantage of operating near the Bab al-Mandab strait, the narrow southern gate to the Red Sea and the Suez route. If commercial shipping treats Bab al-Mandab as unsafe for sustained periods, carriers are pushed back to the longer Cape of Good Hope route, adding time, fuel and vessel capacity constraints to global supply chains.

The Houthis have shown they can impose costs without a formal blockade. A US-brokered ceasefire in May 2025, mediated by Oman, halted Houthi attacks on US shipping after US strikes degraded launchers and infrastructure, the Guardian reports. Even so, major carriers such as Maersk only resumed Red Sea transits slowly, suggesting that shipping decisions follow insurers’ pricing and internal risk models more than diplomatic communiqués.

That dynamic matters because the Houthi toolkit—drones, missiles and small-boat attacks—does not require constant success to change behaviour. A handful of credible launches can raise war-risk premiums, trigger “no sail” clauses in contracts, and lead ports and flag states to tighten compliance requirements. The economic effect compounds when rerouting becomes the default: longer voyages tie up ships, reduce effective fleet supply, and push up freight rates in ways that outlast the immediate exchange of fire.

The Guardian notes the Houthis have reasons to calibrate their escalation. The movement controls large parts of Yemen, including the capital, and has survived leadership losses, including a 2025 strike that killed senior figures. But it also faces incentives to preserve channels with regional powers—particularly Saudi Arabia—where financial and political concessions have been part of Yemen’s shifting internal balance.

For Israel and its partners, the new front turns a regional missile campaign into a maritime risk problem with global spillovers. A Red Sea disruption does not need to be total to be treated as such by underwriters and shipping boards.

On Saturday, the Guardian reported, the Houthis said operations would continue until “aggression” ends on “all fronts.” Israel’s air force, meanwhile, said it was still intercepting drones over its airspace.