Mizuho plans to replace 5000 clerical roles with AI

Images

×

Japanese banks, including Mizuho Financial Group, are trying to boost productivity by adopting artificial intelligence while trying to ease concerns that the technology will take away jobs. japantimes.co.jp

A solar farm in Nakai, Kanagawa Prefecture, in March 2016. Japan gets about a tenth of its electricity from solar panels despite having nearly no domestic production of photovoltaics (PVs). japantimes.co.jp

Sonic the Hedgehog, Castlevania's Alucard and the weak yet lovable Slime from Dragon Quest are just some of Japan's iconic gaming franchises celebrating midlife anniversaries in 2026. japantimes.co.jp

Yamagata co-hosts event on revitalizing rural economies japantimes.co.jp

‹ ›

Mizuho Financial Group says it plans to replace about 5,000 clerical roles with artificial intelligence over the next decade, while insisting the move is “not a headcount reduction.” According to Bloomberg, via The Japan Times, the bank has roughly 15,000 administrative positions across its core banking units and group companies, and says affected staff will be reassigned.

The phrasing matters because Japan’s large employers are trying to modernise without triggering a political or union backlash in a country that is both ageing and short of workers. Mizuho’s public line is that AI will “shift human resources to focus areas” and push employees into “more value-added work,” echoing comments by CEO Masahiro Kihara that “humans will not lose their value.” In banking, that promise often collides with what clerical work actually does: it is the human layer that catches exceptions, questions suspicious transactions, and refuses to let a process complete when the inputs look wrong.

When a bank automates routine back-office decisions, the savings are immediate and measurable; the new risks are diffuse and delayed. Model outputs can be hard to audit, especially when they are embedded in vendor tools or stitched together across departments. Responsibility also becomes easier to blur: a bad customer outcome can be attributed to “the system,” to a vendor, to an internal team that only maintained the pipeline, or to a front-line employee who no longer has the authority to override it. Banks say AI will improve risk management, but it can also create a new class of risk—software-driven decisions that move faster than internal controls, and that can fail in correlated ways.

Global peers are already using the same logic. JPMorgan Chase spends about $2 billion a year on AI development and says it saves roughly the same amount annually, Bloomberg reports. That is the template Mizuho is signalling: the efficiency gain is booked now, while the cost of mistakes—misrouted payments, compliance errors, fraud losses, and customer remediation—shows up later, often outside the unit that captured the benefit.

Mizuho has not said which specific processes will be automated first. It has said that 5,000 administrative jobs will be replaced by AI, and that the bank does not consider that a reduction in headcount.